🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in other member states